Royal Purple Industrial Division Royal Purple Industrial Division Royal Purple Industrial Division Royal Purple Industrial Division
Articles MSDS and Product Sheets

High Film Strength Synthetic Lubricants Save Energy, Increase Profitability

Every maintenance department seeks reduced maintenance costs, increased equipment utilization and improved equipment reliability. To achieve this, maintenance personnel often look to upgrade the plant's lubricants to the latest technology. However, they often find it difficult to immediately justify the higher cost of the oil because maintenance savings cannot be shown prior to purchasing the oil. Furthermore, records are not always user-friendly, making it difficult for personnel to accurately document the savings that result once the high-performance oil is used.

Energy Cost - A New Perspective

Some innovative maintenance personnel have successfully worked within this Catch-22 by documenting energy savings derived from using synthetic lubricants with a high film strength friction-reducing additive technology. Measuring energy savings provides a more immediate and definitive means of justifying the use of such performance-formulated lubricants. Because the cost of energy is a current operating expense, energy savings derived from the use of high-performance lubricants can immediately offset the increased purchase cost. And if the energy savings are sufficiently large, it eliminates having to justify the expenditure through maintenance cost reductions.

As energy costs continue to rise, the amount of energy used becomes a greater and more immediate concern to every company's profitability. Energy cost, often the largest expense of operating rotating equipment, can exceed the cost of maintenance on rotating equipment by 20 to 25 times or more. Because the energy costs are so great, even a one percent reduction in energy consumption produces large dollar savings. This is why significant improvements in lubricant quality offer immensely leveraged opportunities to reduce costs and increase the company's overall earnings.

Measuring Energy Savings

Energy savings are most easily measured by comparing the energy use of the electric motors that power the equipment prior to and following the equipment's lubricant(s) upgrade. Improved equipment efficiency, which is a by-product of the upgraded lubricant, can result in increased machine output, lower operating temperatures and / or reduced energy use. Therefore, accurate comparisons require the equipment to operate at equal work loads when readings are taken. While it is not always possible to measure each variable, a sufficiently large sampling will provide reliable results.

Case Study #1 - Giant Refining Co.

Giant Refining Co. produces 20,000 barrels of oil per day in its New Mexico refinery. In 1997, senior maintenance planner Cecil Cunningham conducted an energy study on lubricants. He selected eight electrically driven process pumps to test the energy savings potential of replacing the R & O mineral oil currently used with a premium lubricant. Cunningham's report concluded, “Based on our test data, using the synthetic lubricating oil Royal Purple® in all lubricated equipment should provide an eight percent average reduction in electrical amperage, a savings of approximately $216,000 per year.” As a result of his testing, he was able to justify converting to the premium lubricant throughout the plant and the change has contributed significantly to Giant's overall profitability.

Procedure

Phase 1 of the test was conducted in two stages. The first stage was to obtain baseline data from the selected motors. The amperage on each motor was checked one day per week, twice on that day, for three months. This was to balance differences in unit operation changes. Stage two was to upgrade the oil using a normal flush out procedure. Amperage draw was checked daily for an additional three-month period (Table 1).

Table 1

view full table

Pump
No.

Prev.
Amps

RP
Amps

Prev. Cost
per
Day, $

RP Cost
per
Day, $

Savings
per
Year, $

Incr. Lube
Cost*, $

Net
Savings
per
Year, $

P105

87 

85.09 

174.00 

170.00 

1,394.00 

60.00 

1,334.00 

P211A

20 

19.42 

35.00 

34.00 

368.00 

60.00 

308.00 

P507 

41 

36.91 

645.00 

580.00 

23,475.00 

360.00 

23,115.00 

P507A 

41 

36.87 

645.00 

580.00 

23,704.00 

360.00 

23,344.00 

P902A 

88 

85.13 

153.00 

148.00 

1,821.00 

360.00 

1,461.00 

P908A 

187 

157.66 

325.00 

274.00 

18,621.00 

60.00 

18,561.00 

PD506 

46.8 

46.65 

94.00 

93.00 

109.00 

60.00 

49.00 

P605 

48.5 

44 

84.00 

77.00 

2,856.00 

60.00 

2,796.00 

Total

 

 

 

 

72,348.00 

1380.00 

70,968.00 


* Increased oil cost based on oil changes two times / year.

Total energy use of these pumps was reduced by 8.5 percent.

Note: Results taken from actual test data report. The daily cost numbers were rounded on the report. Voltage and service factors are not shown due to space restrictions.

Case Study #2 - Major North American Tire Manufacturer

A reliability technician for a tire manufacturer in the southeastern United States tested the energy savings potential of premium lubricants in February 1999. The technician randomly selected 14 pieces of equipment in several plants for evaluation. An ISO VG 32 synthetic lubricant was tested in pumps, compressors and conveyors. The company reduced total energy usage in the test equipment by three percent with an estimated annual savings of $26,884.97. Significant reductions in operating temperature for much of the equipment were also achieved (Table 2).

Procedure

The amperage, voltage and operating temperature of the equipment were measured before and after the oil change. The data was collected using voltage and amperage meters plus a handheld infrared digital thermometer. Measurement readings were taken prior to the oil change at sufficient frequency to ensure an accurate baseline had been established. Following the oil change, data was monitored for an entire year to make sure that the improvements in performance were permanent.

Table 2

view full table

No.

Compressor, Oil

Amp

Temp.
°F

Temp.
°F
after RP

Cost
per
Hour $

Cost
per
Year $

Savings
per
Year ($)

1

Chilled water pump

39.5 

172 

8.73 

76,497.44 

After RP oil change

36 

120 

52 

7.96 

69,719.19 

6,778.25 

2

Backflush pump

20.4 

140 

0.52 

1,082.40 

 

After RP oil change 

18.1 

120 

20 

0.46 

960.36 

122.04 

3

Pump

4.5 

113 

0.11 

1,005.57 

After RP oil change

3.9 

100.5 

12.5 

0.10 

871.49 

134.08 

4

Pump

3.9 

118 

0.10 

871.49 

After RP oil change

3.4 

99.2 

18.8 

0.09 

759.76 

111.73 

5

Cooling water pump

20 

114 

4.42 

38,732.88 

After RP oil change

18.5 

93 

21 

4.09 

35,827.92 

1,904.97 

RP = Royal Purple Synfilm® 32

Note: All voltage measurements were constant. Yearly savings were calculated at 24 hours / day on all equipment except the backflush pump, which was calculated at eight hours / day.

Case Study #3 - Various Ammonia Refrigeration Compressors

Over the past three years, energy savings in food processing plants were documented in reciprocating and flooded screw ammonia refrigeration compressors. The premium lubricant that was selected produced energy savings in ammonia refrigeration compressors in two ways: First, the lubricant reduces friction in the compressor. And second, it remains in the compressor and is not carried downstream with the ammonia into the cold side of the system where it can interfere with the cooling efficiency of the unit.

Table 3 provides a summary for the results on the 34 refrigeration compressors involved in this study. The high VI (Viscosity Index) synthetic lubricant produced significant energy savings regardless of compressor make, type and the previous oil replaced. The lubricant produced an average energy savings of 10.11 percent. In virtually every compressor, oil consumption due to carryover with the ammonia into the cold side of the system was either drastically reduced or eliminated.

Procedure

Refrigeration specialist Bill Irvin collected data from various plant compressors before and after upgrading the oil to a new, high-performance lubricant. The duration of measurement varied based on the desires of each location. Typically, data was collected for one week before and after the oil change. To gather the information, Irvin installed a Pace Scientific XR440-M pocket logger with the appropriate sensors. This unit measured and recorded the suction pressure, discharge pressure and AC amperage of the compressors. Data was collected every two seconds, averaged every two minutes and was later downloaded into a PC laptop computer. Irvin eliminated periods of downtime and plotted the remaining data using 30-minute averages in Microsoft Excel. By comparing the before and after data on the compressors while operating at equal work loads, he was able to document the energy savings derived from the improvement in the efficiency of the compressors.

Conclusion

Due to the increasing cost and tightened availability of energy, the opportunity for significant savings in rotating equipment through improved lubrication is ever increasing. Energy cost is never a part of the maintenance budget, but a part of the operating budget. However, documenting energy savings resulting from improved lubrication creates the opportunity to reduce maintenance costs and increase equipment reliability and profitability. Though the potential for energy savings can vary greatly with different equipment, even a small percentage reduction in energy use will typically pay for the plant's total lubricant expense within a few months.

Table 3

view full table

No.

Company -
Location

Comp.
Type

HP

Prev. Oil

Elec. Cost
kwhr ($)

1000 hr
Oper. Cost
($)

Savings
Percent

Savings
per
1000 hrs.
($)

1

Cold Storage Plant -
Georgia

screw

75 

mineral

0.0500 

3,108.38 

9.20 

285.97 

2

Food Plant -
Arkansas

screw

300 

synthetic

0.0400 

9.946.80 

7.90 

785.80 

3

Food Plant -
Arkansas

recip.*

300 

synthetic

0.0400 

9,946.80 

9.19 

914.11 

4

Food Plant -
Iowa

screw

400 

mineral

0.0550 

18.235.80 

11.48 

2,093.47 

5

Food Plant -
Kansas

recip.

200 

mineral

0.0500 

8,289.00 

11.53 

955.72 


* 502 Freon Gas

** Compressors in booster service 1 year = 8,760 hours

Note: Royal Purple's proprietary Synerlec® additive technology enabled
Uni-Temp™ to produce energy savings even when replacing other premium syntehtic oils.

Author's Note: The names of the tire manufacturer and its reliability technician were withheld due to the company's policy prohibiting the use of its name.

top of page

 

To find the distributor nearest you, please call 888-382-6300



 

Additive Technology Key to Energy Savings

Energy savings result from an improvement in equipment efficiency.

Generally, synthetic oils are more energy efficient than mineral oils because they have a lower coefficient of friction. However more significant energy savings can be achieved through the use of synthetic oils that contain friction-reducing additives.

There are numerous additives that can reduce friction and improve equipment efficiency. Most are compounds containing molybdenum, zinc, sulfur, phosphorus, etc.

The synthetic oils used in these case studies used additive technology proprietary to Royal Purple®.

 



 

Five Steps to Selecting Equipment and Measuring Savings

1.

Select equipment for testing.

 

Not all equipment offers the same potential for energy savings. Different pieces of identical equipment operating in identical service can produce remarkably different energy savings. Therefore, to achieve the most accurate test results:

Measure equipment with the least amount of variation in its work load.

Sample multiple pieces of the equipment to even out any resulting variables.

Heavily loaded equipment offers the greatest opportunities to produce energy savings.

2.

Determine test measurement parameters.

 

Recording the amperage readings of the motor is the most common method used to monitor energy savings. To do so, measure each leg of the motor and average them. For greatest accuracy, voltage also should be recorded. Otherwise it is assumed the voltage is constant. Recording other variables such as flow, pressure, operating or discharge temperature, ambient temperature, etc., when available, will allow for more accurate comparisons.

3.

Collect baseline data on equipment while operating on the existing oil.

4.

Collect the same data again after changing oil.

 

NOTE: Machine operating efficiency can continue to improve for several months after the oil change. Therefore, it is suggested that personnel recollect the data using the same measurement parameters at a later date.

5.

Compile test results.

 

 

Also Read:

China Star Bullet Train Project on Track


“As energy costs continue to rise, the amount of energy used becomes a greater and more immediate concern to every company's profitability. Because the energy costs are so great, even a one percent reduction in energy consumption produces large dollar savings. This is why significant improvements in lubricant quality offer immensely leveraged opportunities to reduce costs and increase the company's overall earnings.”

 

Company History About Royal Purple Sitemap Consumer Division Contact Us Privacy Policy

  Copyright ©2010. Royal Purple, Inc. All Rights Reserved.